Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem:
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/109925
Registro completo de metadatos
Campo DC | Valor | Lengua/Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Gómez Barba, Leopoldo | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Meda Campaña, María Elena | |
dc.contributor.advisor | Jiménez Meza, Ana Rosa | |
dc.contributor.author | Becerra Gaviño, Gustavo | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-01T22:42:33Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-09-01T22:42:33Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-12-11 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://wdg.biblio.udg.mx | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12104/109925 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The application of quantum principles in computing has garnered interest since the 1980s. Today, this concept is not only theoretical, but we have the means to design and execute techniques that leverage the quantum principles to perform calculations. The emergence of the quantum walk search technique exemplifies the practical application of quantum concepts and their potential to revolutionize information technologies. It promises to be versatile and may be applied to various problems. For example, the coined quantum walk search allows for identifying a marked item in a combinatorial search space, such as the quantum hypercube. The quantum hypercube organizes the qubits such that the qubit states represent the vertices and the edges represent the tran sitions to the states differing by one qubit state. It offers a novel framework to repre sent k-mer graphs in the quantum realm. Thus, the quantum hypercube facilitates the exploitation of parallelism, which is made possible through superposition and entangle ment to search for a marked k-mer. However, as found in the analysis of the results, the search is only sometimes successful in hitting the target. Thus, through a meticulous examination of the quantum walk search circuit outcomes, evaluating what input-target combinations are useful, and a visionary exploration of DNA k-mer search, this work opens the door to innovative possibilities, laying down the groundwork for further re search to bridge the gap between theoretical conjecture in quantum computing and a tangible impact in bioinformatics. | |
dc.description.tableofcontents | TABLEOFCONTENTS RESUMEN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . i ABSTRACT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iii LISTOFFIGURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . vii LISTOFTABLES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . viii LISTOFTERMSANDABBREVIATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ix 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 OriginalContributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2.1 JournalCitationReviewsArticle . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.2.2 InternationalCongressPresentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 RelatedFields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3.1 Bioinformatics. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3.2 Computing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.3.3 QuantumComputing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.4 Thiswork . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.4.1 ProblemStatement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 1.4.2 ResearchMethodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.4.3 ResearchQuestion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.4.4 GeneralObjective . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 1.4.5 Hypothesis. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 1.4.6 Justification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2 Literature 7 2.1 DNA2bitEncoding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 2.2 K-merSequencing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 iv 2.3 QuantumComputing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3.1 Whyquantumcomputing? . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 2.3.2 QuantumMechanicsinQuantumComputing . . . . . . . . . . . 9 2.3.3 Thequbit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 2.3.4 MeasuringQubits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 2.3.5 QuantumGates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.3.6 QuantumRegisters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 2.3.7 QuantumAlgorithms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 2.4 QuantumSoftwareStacks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 2.5 IBMQuantumPlatform. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.6 TheCoinedQuantumWalkSearch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 2.7 Puttingittogether . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 3 MaterialsandMethods 19 3.1 ResearchandDevelopmentApproach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.1.1 AgileMethodologies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19 3.1.2 AgileCulture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.1.3 Planning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 3.1.4 AgileWorkItems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 3.1.5 DevSecOps . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.2 InformationTechnologyArchitectureMethods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.2.1 GarageMethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 3.2.2 SystemsContextDiagram. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.2.3 QuantumSoftwareStack . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.3 Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 3.3.1 ContainerizedEnvironment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.3.2 ImporttheQuantumframework. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.3.3 CoinOperator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.3.4 ShiftOperator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.3.5 Markinga2-mertobefound . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.3.6 InitializationString . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.3.7 InitializationEffect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.4 TheHypercube . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 v 4 ExperimentsandResults 38 4.1 Resultsorganization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 5 Discussion 45 6 Conclusion 47 Appendices AppendixA SupportingMaterials 49 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 | |
dc.format | application/PDF | |
dc.language.iso | eng | |
dc.publisher | Biblioteca Digital wdg.biblio | |
dc.publisher | Universidad de Guadalajara | |
dc.rights.uri | https://www.riudg.udg.mx/info/politicas.jsp | |
dc.subject | K-Mer Graph | |
dc.subject | Coined Quantum Walk | |
dc.subject | Quantum Search | |
dc.subject | Quantum Computing With Python | |
dc.subject | Qiskit | |
dc.subject | Quantum Register Initialization | |
dc.title | The Quantum Hypercube as a K-mer Graph. | |
dc.type | Tesis de Doctorado | |
dc.rights.holder | Universidad de Guadalajara | |
dc.rights.holder | Becerra Gaviño, Gustavo | |
dc.coverage | ZAPOPAN, JALISCO | |
dc.type.conacyt | doctoralThesis | |
dc.degree.name | DOCTORADO EN TECNOLOGIAS DE INFORMACION | |
dc.degree.department | CUCEA | |
dc.degree.grantor | Universidad de Guadalajara | |
dc.rights.access | openAccess | |
dc.degree.creator | DOCTOR EN TECNOLOGIAS DE INFORMACION | |
dc.contributor.director | Barbosa Santillán, Liliana Ibeth | |
Aparece en las colecciones: | CUCEA |
Ficheros en este ítem:
Fichero | Tamaño | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
DCUCEA10176FT.pdf | 3.04 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizar/Abrir |
Los ítems de RIUdeG están protegidos por copyright, con todos los derechos reservados, a menos que se indique lo contrario.